0126 Beyond Core Banking Blog 1

There’s a particular kind of risk that only exists in systems that “work.” It’s not the flashy kind, or the kind that triggers emergency funding or board-level interventions. This is a quieter risk, embedded deep in the background of day-to-day operations. 

It’s the infrastructure everyone depends on, but almost no one revisits, because it hasn’t failed loudly enough.

Banks have spent years modernizing what customers can see: digital experiences, mobile apps, real-time payment rails, cloud-native cores. Those investments were necessary. In many cases, they were overdue. And on paper, they delivered exactly what executives asked for.

So, why does it still feel harder than it should be to move money safely, quickly and predictably?

When “good enough” stops being defensible

Most enterprise architects and IT operations leaders know this feeling well. The environment works. Payments clear, and fraud is caught. Reconciliation eventually balances. When something breaks, teams step in, fix it and move on. The system absorbs stress, and people compensate. And because the compensation works, the underlying issue stays invisible.

But “good enough” becomes much harder to defend when three pressures converge at once:

  1. Payments volumes accelerate
  2. Time-to-decision collapses
  3. Accountability increases

That convergence is happening now, and it’s visible to regulators and customers.

Real-time rails like FedNow and real-time payments (RTP) aren’t just faster versions of existing processes. They eliminate the buffer zones — overnight windows, batch retries, manual intervention points — that legacy schedulers took advantage of for decades. At the same time, regulatory scrutiny and customer expectations have converged around one assumption: you know exactly where a payment is, why it failed and what you’re doing about it.

That assumption exposes a structural weakness many banks and financial institutions have learned to work around — but not fix.

The invisible complexity behind every transaction

A modern payment doesn’t move through a straight line. It fans out across fraud detection, compliance checks, routing decisions, settlement systems, reconciliation workflows, notification services and reporting pipelines. Many of those components have been modernized individually. Few have been modernized together.

Orchestration fills the gap.

Many teams still rely on a combination of legacy schedulers, custom scripts and tribal knowledge. It’s not elegant, but it’s familiar. And familiarity is powerful, especially when budgets are tight and priorities are visible elsewhere.

The problem is that technical debt compounds fast, and it’s sticky.

Outages that weren’t supposed to matter

In May 2025, a major outage at Fiserv disrupted payment services across multiple United States banks and credit unions. Zelle transfers stalled, and online banking features and ACH processing were affected. For customers, the experience was confusing. And for banks, it was clarifying. It was a failure of coordination, not innovation.

Similar stories have played out across industries. 

  • Airlines grounded by systems that couldn’t reconcile real-time data flows: Hundreds of flights were canceled in 2022 when key IT systems went offline, revealing how critical poorly coordinated back-end layers can be.
  • Cloud providers experiencing cascading outages because dependency logic behaved differently under load: A major AWS outage in 2025 rippled across global services when internal automation triggers weren’t sufficiently orchestrated, showing how even modern platforms can fail without resilient control layers. 

In each case, the visible platform was modern, but the control layer beneath it was not. These incidents are foreshocks, signaling the risk of a greater problem in the near future. They indicate architectural lag — that the desire for execution speed outpaced application and data orchestration maturity.

The operational resilience question no one wants to ask

Over the past several years, operational resilience has stopped being something IT teams manage behind the scenes and started becoming something boards are directly accountable for. Regulators now expect banks to demonstrate not just recovery plans but clear tolerance for disruption, while customers and markets punish even short-lived outages with lost trust. As a result, resilience is now a governance issue.

Here’s the uncomfortable question many organizations avoid: If a critical payment flow failed right now, could you trace its path end to end quickly enough to meet your obligations without assembling a war room?

Not in theory. Not eventually. But immediately, in real time.

Could you see which system made the last decision, which dependency stalled and which downstream processes were affected? Or would your teams jump between dashboards, logs and scripts to reconstruct the story after the fact?

If the answer feels uncertain, don’t blame capability. The failure is architectural. Operational resilience is proven in the moment of impact: when systems strain, dependencies collide and decisions must be made immediately. It depends on understanding how work actually flows and how systems behave together under stress, so breaks can be proactively identified and addressed in real time, not explained after the fact.

Core modernization: Essential, but not enough

Core banking platforms were never designed to own end-to-end payment coordination. They were designed to be systems of record. Modernizing the core improves performance, scalability and flexibility, sure. But it doesn’t automatically unify the workflows that surround it. Those workflows still exist across dozens of systems: many internal, many external and all interdependent.

Without deliberate payments orchestration, modernization shifts complexity outward. Integration logic multiplies and exception handling becomes bespoke. Therefore, recovery paths vary by payment type, rail and geography.

From the outside, everything looks faster. But inside, operations feel heavier.

Why this matters now

For years, banks could afford to defer this problem. Latency masked fragility, and lots of manual effort absorbed uncertainty. Institutional knowledge filled the gaps, but that tolerance is disappearing.

Real-time payments have reduced recovery windows to seconds. AI-driven fraud models are introducing asynchronous decision points. And each new payment method and provider increases the number of routing paths. Customers, retail and corporate alike expect transparency when something goes wrong. In that environment, orchestration is a strategic capability rather than background plumbing.

Orchestration as the control plane

Being successful at modern payments orchestration means establishing a control plane that understands how payment flows behave across systems.

That includes:

  • Event-driven execution instead of clock-based scheduling
  • Dependency awareness that prevents cascade failures
  • End-to-end visibility across payment journeys
  • Governance and auditability built into execution, not layered on afterward

When orchestration evolves, your ecosystem behaves differently. Failures isolate instead of spread, and recovery is not some heroic moment. You regain your margins quicker than you would’ve thought possible in the worst-of-the-worst scenarios.

Modernizing your orchestration approach is also going to prepare your organization for executing on the AI use cases you’ll need to keep up in tomorrow’s financial services world. Learn how.

The risk (and opportunity) of waiting

The greatest risk in payments modernization today isn’t choosing the wrong platform. It’s assuming the operational foundation will keep holding. Most organizations don’t modernize orchestration because something breaks. They do it because the cost of not knowing what’s happening in their payment flows and not being able to change them quickly — eventually exceeds the cost of change itself. When competitors can launch new payment experiences in weeks and you’re stuck doing it in quarters, the limitation isn’t strategy but orchestration.

Payments modernization is already a recognized growth lever. What’s often missed is where that growth actually comes from. It doesn’t come from new payment types alone, but from the ability to operationalize, deploy and scale them into production quickly and reliably. That capability lives in the underlying application and data pipeline orchestration. When plumbing is rigid, modernization becomes cosmetic rather than transformational.

This is why payments modernization succeeds or fails long before a new rail or service goes live. Real-time processing and richer payment data enable request-to-pay, embedded finance, merchant insights and cross-border optimization. None of these are possible without orchestration that can adapt payment flows quickly, route intelligently across providers and expose consistent data across the ecosystem. Modernization creates growth only when the plumbing underneath is built to move.

The banks that act now won’t be the ones chasing outages but the ones making payments boring again. And in financial services, boring is often the highest compliment. Find out more about how to modernize your payments processes.

About The Author

Michael Wooldridge's Avatar

Michael Wooldridge

Michael Wooldridge is an Enterprise Account Executive in the Regulated Industries practice at Redwood Software. A seasoned executive with extensive experience in technology services and software, he excels in consulting and driving growth for Redwood’s automation software portfolio within Regulated Industries.

Throughout his two-decade career, Michael has worked extensively with Fortune 500 companies and the federal government to transform their organizations to the cloud. He brings a wealth of knowledge and experience in organizational change management and technology transformation across various industries.